Google Pixel 4a vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra camera shootout: Are these pictures really worth $1,000?

6 min read

[responsivevoice_button rate=”1″ pitch=”1.2″ volume=”0.8″ voice=”US English Female” buttontext=”Story in Audio”]

Google Pixel 4a vs Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra camera shootout: Are these pictures really worth $1,000?

The two biggest Android phones of the moment couldn’t be more different. They’re so different, in fact, that there’s nearly $1,000 between them: The Google Pixel 4a costs just $349, and the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra will set you back a whopping $1,300. But while it’s crazy to compare things like performance, design, or battery life between phones so different in price, the camera is another story.

The Pixel 4a’s photography chops are more high-end than its price tag would suggest. It has the same main camera as the $899 Pixel 4 XL, as well as the same camera app features, including Night Sight and Live HDR+. And because it’s a Google phone, we know the processing is off-the-charts awesome. But can it stand up to a phone that costs nearly four times as much? Let’s find out.

Pixel 4a vs Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Bright light

In good lighting, both of these phones perform incredibly well. As you can see in the photos below, both cameras were able to capture impressive detail and color, with the Note 20 Ultra amping up the saturation just a bit more than the 4a. The Pixel 4a captures a bit more leaf detail even in places where the background is blurred, or the lighting is a touch on the dark side.

note 20 vs pixel 4a detail Michael Simon/IDG

The Samsung Note 20 Ultra, left, has incredibly fast and precise autofocus, which works well when your subject stands out.

The clarity and detail on the stigma are very impressive in the Note 20’s shots. That’s aided in part by the Note 20 Ultra’s new laser autofocus, which locks in on its subject very quickly and isn’t fooled by subtle movements caused by the wind. For better or worse, you’re going to get Samsung’s usual oversaturation as you can see in most of the photos here, but that’s mostly subjective. I prefer duller, more realistic shots but many people like the vibrancy Samsung’s production adds to photos.

note 20 vs pixel 4a thorns Michael Simon/IDG

The Note 20 Ultra’s laser autofocus, left, works against it in this very green photo, as it struggled to lock onto the pointy thorns.

However, I found that it tends to focus so well, the surrounding scene was in a constant state of blur even when I wasn’t using Live Focus. It’s easiest to see in the pictures of the thorns above. Where the Pixel 4 zeroed in on the thorns and kept some of the detail on the surrounding leaves, the Note 20 Ultra had a tougher time distinguishing among all the green. And in the photo below, you can already see blurriness around the leaves of the flower, where the Pixel 4a keeps things in focus.

note 20 vs pixel 4a focus Michael Simon/IDG

The laser autofocus sometimes worked a little too well on the Galaxy Note 20, as you can see in the blurriness around the center of the flower, left.

This is something of an extreme example, but the Note 20 Ultra’s laser autofocus is definitely aggressive. I expect it’s something Samsung can dial back in future software updates.

Pixel 4a vs Galaxy Note 20 Ultra: Low light

Google kicked off the race to take the best low-light shots with Night Sight on the Pixel 3. Even without the dedicated Pixel Visual Core processor, you’re getting excellent low-light photos on the 4a.

note 20 vs pixel 4a low light2 Michael Simon/IDG

Samsung has greatly improved low-light performance on the Note 20 Ultra, left, with excellent detail, shadows, and brightness as compared to the Pixel 4a.

Samsung has made great strides with its own low-light mode on the Note 20 Ultra as well. With a decent amount of ambient light, otherwise dark photos were nicely brightened on Note while still preserving shadows, with even greater detail than the Pixel 4a as seen in the photos above.

You May Also Like